Skip to main content

I Read It, But I Don't Get It

My favorite part of this book were all the strategies that we were given to "fix up" the confusion that students have when reading. The chapter starts out with a kid saying that when he doesn't understand, he just stops reading. This has been something I have done in the past as a student and so I think that it is important that teachers try and use a few of these strategies to help fix the confusion that kids are having.
The first strategy asks for students to connect what they are reading to their own life, other texts, or their knowledge of the world. The problem with this is sometimes students are going to need help making those connections. This is where the facilitation of learning from the teacher comes into play. Once the teacher helps the student make those connections, often times then students understand the reading 100xs better and can continue to learn on their own after that connection has been made.
The second strategy is to make a prediction. If students can take what they know and make educated guesses about what is coming next, then it will help them to comprehend what they are reading and make all those connections so much easier.
Thinking and writing about what you have already read are two important steps as well. Allowing students to stop and process what is going on for many kids is a vital step in their learning process. For kids who tend to be extremely analytical, they cannot learn effectively without this step. And then for those kids who are visual learners and can process things better by getting it down on paper in a notebook.
Another good idea I thought was the suggestion to retell what you've read. In order for students to retell what is going on, they have to understand what they are reading. By having students retell, we as teachers can see if they are not understanding what is going on by if they are able to retell or not. If they are having trouble retelling it, then maybe we jump over to the reread stage which gives students another opportunity to understand what they have been reading.

My favorite analogy was the comparison to reading and driving a car.
The plan to fix the problem doesn't have to be elaborate, but it does have to meet the demands of the situation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Annabel Lee TPA

Department of Education College of Arts, Letters and Education 312 Williamson Hall Cheney, WA   99004 TPA Lesson Plan #___1____ Course: Engl 493 1. Teacher Candidate Lauren Archer Date Taught 11/13/2017 Cooperating Teacher Jason Reed School/District Oakesdale MS/HS 2. Subject ELA Field Supervisor Stephanie Boughter 3. Lesson Title/Focus Annabel Lee-Theme Development 5. Length of Lesson 20mins 4. Grade Level 9 th grade 6. Academic & Content Standards (Common Core/National) CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.9-10.2 Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text. ...

Assignment Template

When reading this article, I found myself reflecting on my own lessons and teaching ideas, which made a few things in this article stand out to me more than others.  This first part that really stood out to me was having the students write in the margins as they read. The first part I believe asked students to label in the left hand margin the summary, introduction, issue or problem being addressed, the author’s main arguments, the author’s examples, and the conclusion. Then the second part asks students to write in the right hand margin their reactions to what the author is saying. They list some possible reactions as personal connections they can make, reflection on the quality of evidence the author offers, and any questions or contradictions they have with what the author is presenting. The first thought that came to mind was that a lot of students cannot write in their textbooks and so this may be something that is hard for them to do. But then I thought that they could do so...

Paulo Freire: Chapter 2 of Pedagogy

This was one of the more interesting articles that we have read. In Paulo Freire’s Chapter Two, he explains the difference between educators who use banking educational methods and educators who are humanist revolutionary educators. “Education is suffering from narration sickness”, he writes. What he is referring to is the way many teachers just talk and talk at students and expect them to absorb all the narration that they’re lecturing at them. He continues further down saying, “His task [the teacher’s] is to fill the student with contents of his narration”. Take note on that…”to fill the student with contents of his narration”. Not to help the students to grow in their learning and develop within the content, but to lead them in a direction of memorization. He makes a reference that compares this sort of educating to depositing money in a bank or trash in the trash can. The students become the trash can or the bank account that the teacher deposits his trash and money into. However...