One section of this article that really stood out to me was the section that discussed how we teach certain canonical texts. The article listed texts such as Beowulf, The Canterbury Tales, Macbeth, and Hamlet that were to taught to a diverse group of students through a multicultural lens. They did this by having students pay attention to which characters "were distinguished as cultural". I found this to be an interesting idea simply because I had never thought about putting a multicultural spin on classic texts before. However, this article brings up the idea that ANY text can be read with a multicultural lens if educators encourage it.
The other end of this is the idea of educators making sure that they include texts that are written by minorities. When texts like this are included, you can get a better full picture of the writings of that time, especially historical writings, which are largely white male with a little bit of white women sprinkled in. Culturally diverse texts as well as the traditional canon texts seems to be the best of both worlds when it comes to creating the ideal classroom pedagogy.
"We also endeavored as educators to question and expand the literary canon; critical pedagogy in urban secondary English necessarily entails questioning what actually constitutes a text worthy of study". This is the exact reason that talks about how we as educators have the right to push the boundaries of the literary canons and our pedagogy.
What makes a text worthy of study???
The other end of this is the idea of educators making sure that they include texts that are written by minorities. When texts like this are included, you can get a better full picture of the writings of that time, especially historical writings, which are largely white male with a little bit of white women sprinkled in. Culturally diverse texts as well as the traditional canon texts seems to be the best of both worlds when it comes to creating the ideal classroom pedagogy.
"We also endeavored as educators to question and expand the literary canon; critical pedagogy in urban secondary English necessarily entails questioning what actually constitutes a text worthy of study". This is the exact reason that talks about how we as educators have the right to push the boundaries of the literary canons and our pedagogy.
What makes a text worthy of study???
Comments
Post a Comment