Skip to main content

The Common Core State Standards for ELA Instruction in Grades 6-12

In all honesty, before reading this handout, I had never done much research on the Common Core Standards. I had always heard different teachers and parents talking about them, voicing their opinions either for or against it, but I had never formulated my own opinion on the issue. This article blew my mind. Everything I thought I knew appears to be a misconception about the CCSS.
The first section that stood out to me was the one explaining what they are. The article states, “the Common Core State Standards set general goals for student learning but they do not specify what or how to teach….standards provide a definition of what is possible, but standards are not curriculum documents”. I had always assumed that the common core had handed out what lessons needed to be teached. As it turns out, they are literally just a list of all the standards fore which students and teachers are working to achieve. They are what is possible.
The one problem I do see with these standards for everyone to be using is the differences in demographics. Who is to say high poverty and low poverty areas can and should be reaching for the same standards? I think that they are nice suggested standards, but if anyone is going to be enforcing specific standards, it should be the school districts because nobody knows those kids and what they need to learn better than that school and that teacher that is in the classroom with those kiddos every day. I think that the article is spot on when it states, “Whether your implementation of the CCSS will meet these high expectations depends on your passionate commitment to making higher standards meaningful, relevant, and attainable for the increasingly diverse students in America’s public schools”. All kids deserve to have their education tailored to their needs, their culture, and their geographic area.

The last thing that really popped out to me teachers realizing that they can still have a significant role in choosing what texts they cover in their classroom. The CCSS do not give you what to teach. They show you what you should aim your teaching to attain, but not once do they tell you how to get there. That is totally up to each teacher which if you ask me is extremely scary and beautiful at the same time. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Annabel Lee TPA

Department of Education College of Arts, Letters and Education 312 Williamson Hall Cheney, WA   99004 TPA Lesson Plan #___1____ Course: Engl 493 1. Teacher Candidate Lauren Archer Date Taught 11/13/2017 Cooperating Teacher Jason Reed School/District Oakesdale MS/HS 2. Subject ELA Field Supervisor Stephanie Boughter 3. Lesson Title/Focus Annabel Lee-Theme Development 5. Length of Lesson 20mins 4. Grade Level 9 th grade 6. Academic & Content Standards (Common Core/National) CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RL.9-10.2 Determine a theme or central idea of a text and analyze in detail its development over the course of the text, including how it emerges and is shaped and refined by specific details; provide an objective summary of the text. ...

Assignment Template

When reading this article, I found myself reflecting on my own lessons and teaching ideas, which made a few things in this article stand out to me more than others.  This first part that really stood out to me was having the students write in the margins as they read. The first part I believe asked students to label in the left hand margin the summary, introduction, issue or problem being addressed, the author’s main arguments, the author’s examples, and the conclusion. Then the second part asks students to write in the right hand margin their reactions to what the author is saying. They list some possible reactions as personal connections they can make, reflection on the quality of evidence the author offers, and any questions or contradictions they have with what the author is presenting. The first thought that came to mind was that a lot of students cannot write in their textbooks and so this may be something that is hard for them to do. But then I thought that they could do so...

Paulo Freire: Chapter 2 of Pedagogy

This was one of the more interesting articles that we have read. In Paulo Freire’s Chapter Two, he explains the difference between educators who use banking educational methods and educators who are humanist revolutionary educators. “Education is suffering from narration sickness”, he writes. What he is referring to is the way many teachers just talk and talk at students and expect them to absorb all the narration that they’re lecturing at them. He continues further down saying, “His task [the teacher’s] is to fill the student with contents of his narration”. Take note on that…”to fill the student with contents of his narration”. Not to help the students to grow in their learning and develop within the content, but to lead them in a direction of memorization. He makes a reference that compares this sort of educating to depositing money in a bank or trash in the trash can. The students become the trash can or the bank account that the teacher deposits his trash and money into. However...